51.4%
LLM Quality Improvement
+1.55
Retrieval NDCG@10 Gain
20/21
Role Pairs Orthogonal
~$295M
Risk-Adj. Expected Value
Patent-Pending AI Infrastructure

Grammar-Aware AI
Grammatical Orthogonality for Large Language Models

Inventor: Michael Malgeri  ·  2026  ·  Patent Pending  ·  TRL 4 — Lab Validated

The Problem

Current LLMs treat every word identically — whether it's a subject, a verb, or an adjective. Grammatical roles are entangled in a single embedding space, making models harder to interpret, control, or improve. There is no way to surgically modify one aspect of generated text without re-generating everything.

The Solution

We add seven grammatically orthogonal embedding subspaces — one per grammatical role — plus a three-part dependency system that detects when orthogonality is violated and corrects for it automatically. The result is a more accurate, interpretable, and controllable language model that outperforms models 3× its size and improves retrieval quality.

Measured Results — Reproducible Prototype
51.4%
Language model quality improvement
361 → 176 perplexity vs identical-architecture baseline (20 epochs, monotonic improvement)
+1.55
Retrieval NDCG@10 improvement
Grammar fine-tuning vs grammar-free fine-tuning on SciFact — consistent across all 3 epochs
20/21
Grammatical role pairs orthogonal
95.2% — without explicit supervision, confirmed across LM and retrieval domains
Parameter Efficiency
Our 51M grammar model outperforms a 151M grammar-free model by 78% (176 vs 313 PPL) after equal training — using 66% fewer parameters. The 151M unstructured model degraded to 533 PPL by epoch 20. Our model improved monotonically. Grammatical structure acts as a built-in regularizer.
7B Scale
Dependency detection confirmed model-agnostic at Mistral 7B scale. NS↔NO remains the dominant role correlation across three completely different model types — proving the detection methodology is not a small-model artifact.
Retrieval Test
Grammar embedding fine-tuning improved SciFact NDCG@10 by +1.55 points over identical grammar-free fine-tuning using bge-base-en-v1.5 (architecturally similar to Cohere Embed v3). The NS↔NO dependency was confirmed as dominant in the grammar retrieval bi-encoder — completing a three-model, two-task validation.

NS↔NO Dependency — Three-Model, Two-Task Validation

ModelNS↔NOMean corrSentences
51M additive LM (from scratch) 0.25840.08296,258
Mistral 7B (pretrained LM) 0.10970.01671,630
Grammar bi-encoder retrieval (fine-tuned) 0.21910.04152,000
The Three-Component System
🧠
1. Grammatical Embeddings

Seven Role-Specific Subspaces

Subject noun, verb, object noun, modifiers, prepositions. Each token receives a full-dimension base embedding plus a small, learnable role offset. No information loss — every dimension is used.

🔍
2. Dependency Detection

Automated Correlation Analysis

Measures pairwise Pearson correlation between role activations across 2,000–6,258 passages. Identifies NS↔NO as the dominant dependency across LM and retrieval tasks. Model-agnostic and task-agnostic.

🛡
3. Dependency Correction

Linear Correction Modules

Trains lightweight correction modules per detected dependency. Reduces mean role correlation by 21–32% depending on model. Assigns adaptive weights based on dependency scores.

Customer Use Cases

IP Status & Next Steps

Open Now
🚀 Pilot customer conversations
💰 Seed round — $3–5M target
💡 Licensing discussions — AI labs & platforms